Antany Peter

CORRESPONDENCE

A Letter to the Russian Ambassador

H.E. Dr Alexey Pavlovsky
Ambassador
Embassy of Russian Federation
78 Canberra Avenue, Griffith, ACT 2603
Telephone: +61(2) 6295 9033
E-mail: australia@mid.ru

Date: 14th of March 2025.

Your Excellency,

Re: Ukraine could become the second Alaska, and it certainly won't be the last. 

"Trump Demands More Than Access to Minerals From Ukrainian President." Source - Townhall March 10, 2025

To begin with, it's crucial to address the psychological aspect of winning a war. President Putin, having a background as a spy rather than a military strategist, failed to grasp the war strategies employed by the Five Eyes countries. The United States rarely engages in conflict alone; it excels at rallying its allies to share the burden of warfare. In stark contrast, President Putin struggled to secure open commitments from Russian allies when he decided to invade Ukraine. This marked a significant psychological victory for the US. Putin's inability to mirror the US's strategic alliances and coordination in war efforts makes it highly unlikely that he could devise unique strategies to counter the US and its allies.

I initially believed that China would align more closely with Russia, perhaps even making a move on Taiwan to complicate the logistics of supplying weapons to two simultaneous conflict zones. I was genuinely surprised to see Russia standing alone. If I were in Putin's position, I would have hesitated to invade Ukraine without a clear, public commitment from China. While China may have offered indirect support to Russia, such gestures hold little weight in the psychological battle of winning a war.

Secondly, I want to discuss the importance of exposing your opponents' wrongdoings to claim the moral high ground, thereby gaining more allies and isolating your adversaries. Unfortunately, Russia failed entirely to isolate the US, despite the fact that the US itself was founded on acts of genocide. The Five Eyes countries have amassed vast resources through the invasion of foreign lands and the systematic eradication of indigenous populations. They understand that committing such atrocities has historically allowed them to gain dominance over others and secure their position as global powers.

Sadly, President Putin and his Russian predecessors have failed to expose the atrocities committed by the Five Eyes countries around the world. In doing so, they not only betrayed their own nation but also the majority of the global population, who remain unaware of the extent of these crimes. In 1939, the Soviet Union achieved a significant diplomatic milestone by signing the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact with Germany. This agreement ensured that neither country would take military action against the other for ten years. However, Russian leaders should have been far more vigilant when Adolf Hitler later decided to invade the Soviet Union, especially after the pact had been signed. This betrayal highlighted a critical failure in foresight and strategy.

Historical accounts suggest that Hitler initially intended to invade Great Britain but ultimately shifted his focus to the Soviet Union. The fact that he did not pursue an invasion of Britain underscores the influence and power of English-speaking nations. Their ability to deter such an attack, while the Soviet Union became the target, reveals the strategic dominance of the Five Eyes countries. By failing to expose their historical and ongoing wrongdoings, Russian leaders have allowed these nations to maintain their moral and political authority, further isolating Russia on the global stage. This inaction has not only weakened Russia’s position but also deprived the world of a critical counterbalance to the unchecked power of the Five Eyes alliance.

I hold an Australian business degree and a postgraduate qualification, and I have spent a significant portion of my life in libraries, deepening my understanding of world history, the global economy, and international affairs. To further enhance my practical knowledge, I have traveled to over 35 countries and lived on four continents. Above all, I have no criminal record. Yet, despite my qualifications and experiences, the Five Eyes countries—particularly Australian politicians and their so-called intelligence units—have systematically isolated me based on disinformation and manipulation.

Decades ago, the Five Eyes countries exploited the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora to isolate me, spreading false hope that Tamils would achieve an independent state of Eelam. Today, they are using similar tactics with the Indian diaspora, feeding Indians the illusion that India will become a superpower. Many average Indians working as security personnel or Uber drivers in Australia, driven by poverty or discrimination based on language, religion, or caste in their home country, are eager to please Australian politicians and intelligence agencies. They are unaware of how they are being used as tools against people like me or even against India’s long-term interests.

The Five Eyes countries now have an even larger pool of South Asians to draw from in their efforts to isolate me. It is an increasingly difficult battle. Despite the challenges, I remain steadfast in my mission to expose the truth. The road is tough, but I will not yield to the manipulative tactics of the Five Eyes countries or their allies, especially to the descendants of convicts who now hold political power in Australia.

Having lived in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, and extensively traveled in the United States and the United Kingdom, I have firsthand experience of how these nations manipulate and divide people to achieve their goals. I am more qualified than my siblings and have even provided financial assistance to them, such as repairing my parents’ house in Sri Lanka so my sister would have a place to live. Yet, for reasons I cannot comprehend, my siblings harbor animosity toward me. In Australia, a country often touted as "civilized," I am forced to sleep in my car because I cannot rent an apartment. I am even barred from joining group dance classes to stay fit, all due to the spread of disinformation about me. This demonstrates the English-speaking countries’ unparalleled ability to divide and conquer their opponents.

I doubt that the Russians or Chinese truly understand the extent of the English-speaking countries’ ability to manipulate and divide their adversaries as I do. I believe that these nations pushed Adolf Hitler to turn against Russia by exploiting fears of communism, while Russian leaders failed to counter this by exposing the atrocities committed by the English-speaking countries. Had Russian leaders questioned why Hitler targeted Russia instead of Britain and strategically undermined the English-speaking nations, the global balance of power might look very different today. Instead, the English-speaking countries and their allies have successfully used Ukraine as a focal point to encircle Russia, a situation that could have been avoided with more astute geopolitical maneuvering.

The Nazis may have even drawn inspiration for their concept of mass killing from the actions of British settlers. Professor Taiaiake Alfred, a Kahnawake Mohawk educator, writer, and founding director of the University of Victoria's Indigenous Governance programs in Canada, argues that celebrating events like "America's 400th Birthday" glosses over the genocide of Native peoples. He states, *"It's hard for a Native person to be anything but shocked and saddened to the core by the effrontery of it all. Jamestown 2007 is, in essence, a surreptitious celebration of the conquest of our homeland and the destruction of our people in the service of imperialism and the expansion of the white race. It marks the era that saw Indigenous peoples ravaged by diseases introduced by European settlers, on average, our communities lost 75 percent of their populations, and the dispossession of our homelands by fraud and deceit—not a single treaty entered into by the English Crown or the US has been honored by the white settlers."* (Taiaiake, 2007).

Conservative American scholars estimate that around 100 million Native Americans and Canadian Aboriginal people were killed by British settlers, while non-conservative scholars place the figure closer to 200 million. Russian leaders, however, seemed to believe they could coexist peacefully with their fellow white Caucasians by turning a blind eye to the world's greatest genocide, which claimed the lives of millions of people of color. In doing so, they committed a grave moral sin—one that will inevitably come back to haunt them. By failing to confront these historical injustices and align themselves with the oppressed, Russian leaders have not only lost the moral high ground but also ensured their own isolation in the long run.

If Russian leaders had exposed the atrocities committed by the Five Eyes countries and collaborated with Europeans to seek justice, it could have elevated Russia's global leadership role. Such actions might have halted the decline of the Russian Empire, which has suffered from military defeats and cultural isolation. Instead, Russian leaders made a critical mistake by allowing the British Empire to exploit resources through genocidal conquests on foreign continents. For instance, British convicts, supported by the Empire, settled in Australia and inflicted immense harm on the Indigenous population. Despite Australia's location in Australasia, the "White Australia" policy persisted until the 1970s. The resources seized from these conquered lands were used to expand British influence, all while Russia remained complicit through its inaction. Even the handover of Alaska to the United States further advanced this agenda.

Russia's failure to expose the atrocities of the Five Eyes countries has allowed these nations to maintain their global influence. This is why much of the world, including Europeans, continues to align with them. It’s no surprise that former Soviet Union countries now blindly follow the Five Eyes nations. The Russian Empire’s inability to curb British expansion—by allowing the creation of colonies built on genocide—was a monumental failure. The British Empire sent convicts to Australia, wiping out entire Indigenous populations, such as the Tasmanian Aboriginal people, yet Russian leaders did nothing. Had Russia taken a stand against these atrocities and brought global attention to the crimes committed in Australia during the 18th century, the Five Eyes countries might not exist today, and Russia would not find itself encircled by adversaries. Having lost the status of both the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, Russian leaders now struggle to protect their nation. The sale of Alaska to the United States was another strategic blunder, as Russian leaders mistakenly believed it would foster closer ties with America. The most effective way to counter the Five Eyes countries is to expose their historical and ongoing wrongdoings.

The combined population of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand makes up just 3.9% of the global population. Yet, the political elites of these nations easily manipulate others because much of the world remains unaware or misinformed. If they can deceive Russian leaders into selling Alaska, it’s no wonder they can manipulate nations like Iraq and Libya to exploit their resources. I have exposed the double standards of the Five Eyes countries, but isolating me is easy because I live among them. Last August, I sought political asylum in Russia, inspired by their granting of asylum to Edward Snowden. However, Russian media and leaders showed no interest in my case, likely because I am not a white Caucasian.

Even today, the descendants of British convicts in Australia continue to exclude people of Asian descent from prominent positions, despite Australia’s geographic location in Australasia. These settlers arrived, killed the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and then wrote a constitution claiming Australia belonged to no one—effectively declaring it the property of the settlers. The Australian constitution makes no mention of the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander peoples, who have lived on the continent for over 60,000 years. Australian historians acknowledge the complete eradication of the Aboriginal population in Tasmania but downplay the genocide on the mainland. The National Art Gallery in Canberra documents the loss of numerous tribes and languages during British colonization, yet this information contradicts the sanitized narratives presented by many historical writers. The truth about the genocide of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples remains obscured, allowing the Five Eyes countries to maintain their moral facade while continuing to exploit weaker nations.

The Extermination of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

In the 18th century, the British began settling European convicts on the island of Tasmania. These convicts, removed from mainland Australia for committing severe crimes, were sent to Tasmania as part of colonial expansion. Upon arrival, they systematically targeted the Indigenous Aboriginal population. They kidnapped Aboriginal children to use as servants and took women as concubines, while killing or mutilating the men to seize their homelands. In 1828, Governor George Arthur issued an order forcing all Tasmanian Aboriginal people to leave areas settled by Europeans. To enforce this, government-sponsored "patrol teams"—composed of prisoners led by police—were formed. These teams hunted and killed Aboriginal people in what became known as "catching blacks." This brutal practice was incentivized with bounties: five British pounds for an adult Aboriginal person’s head and two pounds for a child’s. The bodies of those killed were often dumped off a cliff, now infamously known as Victory Hill.

Governor Arthur’s policies were further encouraged by figures like John Batman, a prominent leader and later a founding father of Melbourne, who shot two Aboriginal people while they were in his custody (Combat Genocide Association, 2019). Evidence shows that the British implemented genocidal policies and practices aimed at eradicating Aboriginal people and their culture. According to Professor Tom Lawson, the British actively supported the ethnic cleansing of Tasmanian Aboriginal people during the period of martial law between 1828 and 1832. Lawson argues that terms like "extermination" and "extirpation" were commonly used by colonists when discussing the invasion of Aboriginal homelands (Lawson, 2014). Historian Nick Brodie further emphasizes that the genocide was meticulously orchestrated but deliberately concealed. Brodie’s research, based on over 1,000 pages of Governor Arthur’s handwritten documents, reveals the calculated methods used to carry out the genocide in Tasmania (Brodie, 2017).

To gain public support, Arthur leaked stories to the press and announced "retirement" for those who continued to back the genocide. He selectively provided evidence to investigative committees to cover up his atrocities and declared details of the genocide top secret. Meanwhile, military offensives against the remaining Aboriginal population continued unabated (Harman, 2018). By this time, most Aboriginal people had either been forcibly removed from their homelands, killed, or had died from diseases introduced by European settlers (Lourandos, 1997). The last full-blooded Tasmanian Aboriginal, Truganini, witnessed the massacre of her people. Her mother was killed by sailors, her uncle shot by soldiers, her sister abducted by sealers, and her fiancé murdered by timber cutters. Truganini herself endured rape, exile, and the trauma of watching her family, relatives, and friends being systematically exterminated (Morris, 2017). Her life stands as a tragic testament to the horrors inflicted upon the Tasmanian Aboriginal people.

The genocide of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Tasmania was not an isolated event but part of a broader pattern of colonial violence. Despite attempts to downplay or conceal these atrocities, the evidence reveals a deliberate and systematic effort to eliminate Indigenous populations. The legacy of this genocide continues to haunt Australia, as the descendants of these communities fight for recognition, justice, and the preservation of their culture.

Conclusion...

The Russian leaders have consistently failed to expose the atrocities committed by the Five Eyes countries, which is why these nations have successfully garnered more allies and divided Russia from its neighboring countries. By neglecting to highlight the crimes of British colonialism and the English-speaking world, Russian leaders missed a critical opportunity to isolate these powers and weaken their global influence. Instead, they made grave strategic errors, such as selling Alaska to the United States in a misguided attempt to foster friendship with America. These decisions—failing to expose colonial atrocities and relinquishing Alaska—stand as some of the worst political blunders in the history of the Russian Empire. Today, these mistakes continue to haunt Russia in ways beyond imagination.

However, it is never too late to act. I urge Russian and Chinese leaders to take decisive steps to educate future generations about the true history of colonialism and its devastating impacts. Every Russian and Chinese citizen should be aware of what happened to Africans during the transatlantic slave trade, the Native peoples of North America, and the Indigenous populations of Australasia. This knowledge is essential to counter the narratives perpetuated by the Five Eyes countries and their allies.

Furthermore, I call on Russian and Chinese leaders to provide scholarships to Native American, Canadian Aboriginal, and Australian Indigenous students. By empowering these communities to create their own leaders, they can fight to preserve their languages, cultures, and lands, much like Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela did for their people. The world’s majority must no longer allow invaders—especially the descendants of convicts who now preach democracy and human rights—to occupy the homelands of others and dictate global morality. The time has come for Russia and China to take a stand, expose the historical and ongoing injustices of the Five Eyes countries, and support the oppressed in their struggle for freedom and dignity. Only by doing so can we challenge the dominance of these powers and work toward a more just and equitable world.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2025/03/10/trump-to-demand-more-from-ukraine-than-minerals-n2653534?sfnsn=mo

A reply from the Prime Minister's office

The Prime Minister's office has responded to my letter regarding the discriminatory white Australia policy Constitution. However, instead of addressing my concerns directly, my letter has been redirected to the National Indigenous Australians Agency. What we truly need is a referendum to change the discriminatory white Australia policy Constitution to acknowledge vibrant multicultural Australia. Unfortunately, it appears that there is a lack of genuine interest in resolving the issues faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The political leaders seem to propose ideas that primarily benefit certain government organisations enabling them to manipulate and exploit Indigenous people’s resources.

We also need a thorough examination of the allocation of funding for the welfare of Indigenous communities. While countries like China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam, etc. are progressing. However, Indigenous communities in Australia have remained stagnant for centuries. Despite receiving significant amounts of financial support, they are not experiencing the same advancements witnessed in Asian countries with fewer resources. It is evident that the allocated funds are not reaching the right people. This raises serious concerns about how funds are managed by the government. It seems these funds appear to be utilised to sustain government-funded organisations to keep Indigenous people in ignorance to exploit their resources.